There are many variations of the design-to-construction business process,
including the organization of the project team, how the team members are
paid, and who absorbs various risks. There are lump-sum contracts, cost plus
a fi xed or percentage fee, various forms of negotiated contracts, and so forth.
It is beyond the scope of this book to outline each of these and the benefits
and problems associated with them (but see Sanvido and Konchar, 1999; and
Warne and Beard, 2005).
With regard to the use of BIM, the general issues that either enhance or
diminish the positive changes that this technology offers depends on how well
and at what stage the project team works collaboratively on one or more digital
models. The DBB approach presents the greatest challenge to the use of BIM
because the contractor does not participate in the design process and thus must
build a new building model after design is completed. The DB approach may
provide an excellent opportunity to exploit BIM technology, because a single
entity is responsible for design and construction. The CM@R approach allows
early involvement of the constructor in the design process which increases the
benefit of using BIM and other collaboration tools. Various forms of integrated
project delivery are being used to maximize the benefi ts of BIM and “Lean”
(less wasteful) processes. Other procurement approaches can also benefit
from the use of BIM but may achieve only partial benefits, particularly if BIM
technology is not used collaboratively during the design phase.
No comments:
Post a Comment